Post by messi05 on Jan 23, 2024 22:58:24 GMT -5
The 2nd Section of the Superior Court of Justice decided this Wednesday (27/9) that two special appeals that discuss the reimbursement of savers who suffered monetary correction purges in the Plano Verão, in January 1989, will no longer be judged as repetitive. The controversy that was submitted to the rite discusses the possibility or not of the saver executing a collective judicial sentence even though he was not affiliated with the entity authoring the demand at the time of its filing.
The judgment of the appeals began on 9/13, when Buy Phone Number List the rapporteur, minister Raul Araújo, voted in favor of savers. They complain about the difference between the savings correction and the official inflation index that occurred during the execution of the economic plan. The banks argued that only those who were associated at the time the action was filed would have active legitimacy for the execution. When the trial resumed this Wednesday, the collegiate's understanding prevailed that the issue had already been resolved by the STJ when judging Special Appeal 1,391,198, in 2014, also under the repetitive procedure.
At the time, the ministers recognized the possibility of executing a sentence obtained in a collective action by anyone who, at the beginning of the process, was not associated with the entity that filed the claim. When presenting a vote on the two appeals on the agenda, Minister Villas Bôas Cueva explained that the court's precedent is applicable to the case, and there is no need for a new ruling from the court. The second issue discussed in the processes concerns the passive legitimacy of HSBC bank to respond for compensation to former Bamerindus customers who suffered purges in their savings accounts.
The judgment of the appeals began on 9/13, when Buy Phone Number List the rapporteur, minister Raul Araújo, voted in favor of savers. They complain about the difference between the savings correction and the official inflation index that occurred during the execution of the economic plan. The banks argued that only those who were associated at the time the action was filed would have active legitimacy for the execution. When the trial resumed this Wednesday, the collegiate's understanding prevailed that the issue had already been resolved by the STJ when judging Special Appeal 1,391,198, in 2014, also under the repetitive procedure.
At the time, the ministers recognized the possibility of executing a sentence obtained in a collective action by anyone who, at the beginning of the process, was not associated with the entity that filed the claim. When presenting a vote on the two appeals on the agenda, Minister Villas Bôas Cueva explained that the court's precedent is applicable to the case, and there is no need for a new ruling from the court. The second issue discussed in the processes concerns the passive legitimacy of HSBC bank to respond for compensation to former Bamerindus customers who suffered purges in their savings accounts.